Showing posts with label levee protection. Show all posts
Showing posts with label levee protection. Show all posts

Friday, March 06, 2009

Ugh, Stacy, Stop it.

Stop doing things like this.

Following the lead of some nearby parishes, the New Orleans City Council voted Thursday to continue using 2006 advisory base flood elevation maps to determine minimum construction elevations in Orleans Parish until at least 2011.

The vote was 5-0, but Councilwoman Stacy Head used the occasion to denounce eastern New Orleans and Lower 9th Ward "activists" who refuse to look at the good of the city as a whole and insist on special treatment for their heavily storm-damaged neighborhoods, she said.

--

She then compared her willingness to "do the right thing" with what she depicted as the selfishness of "activists" in eastern New Orleans and the Lower 9th Ward. She said they demand preferential treatment for their parts of the city as "a perceived right" because those areas suffered heavily after Hurricane Katrina, even though many other parts of the city also were flooded and badly damaged.

Head did not include any council members in her criticism, but Councilwomen Cynthia Hedge-Morrell and Cynthia Willard-Lewis, who represent the areas to which Head referred, have in the past complained that their districts have been treated unfairly in the distribution of post-Katrina aid.


Totally inflammatory and 100% unnecessary.

Guess what? Eastern New Orleans and the Lower 9th Ward DO deserve preferential treatment. They do! They do! They totally do!

I don't want to have to go into a long rant about privilege and victimization before, during, and after Katrina right now. I really don't. I hope that my position has been consistently clear.

But even if you've never understood it or still don't buy it, you have to recognize how out-of-touch or intentionally mean-spirited this kind of language is.

The words and tone are explicitly evocative of Reagan-era Republican arguments against helping inner cities and emblematic of why Stacy Head has become such a magnet for criticism from the African American community. "Activist" and "perceived right" are especially insulting code words when used in this context.

I would have thought someone as sharp as Stacy Head would have picked up on this by now.

It's infuriating.

And of all the times for Cynthia Willard-Lewis to hold her tongue...

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Hurricane Protection and the Infrastructure Stimulus

Oyster has a must-read post today about Bush administration efforts to refuse SE Louisiana the critical levees it needs. During the Presidential campaign, Barack Obama promised to change that. Obama has a full fact-sheet on Katrina, it's worth your while to read (pdf).

As president, Barack Obama and Joe Biden will keep the broken promises made by President Bush to rebuild New Orleans and the Gulf Coast.


So what does that mean for hurricane protection?

As president, Barack Obama will ensure that New Orleans has a levee and pumping system to protect the city against a 100-year storm by 2011, with the ultimate goal of protecting the entire city from a Category 5 storm. Obama and Biden will also direct revenues from offshore oil and gas drilling to increased coastal hurricane protection.

--

Barack Obama and Joe Biden will help the Gulf Coast restore the wetlands, marshes and barrier islands that are critical to tamping down the force of hurricanes. They will work with local governments to develop the best strategies for protecting and expanding wetlands.


These promises are vague. We have to pin the Obama administration down. Certainly there are many angry legislators willing to speak out over the Bush administration obstacle course but I have not seen much evidence that our elected officials will be attempting to do force the immediate action we need using the infrastructure stimulus bill. This strikes me as a missed opportunity.

I also have not seen much evidence that national progressive bloggers or mainstream journalists are particularly interested in pinning the administration down on hurricane protection infrastructure. I haven't seen many outside of SE Louisiana particularly willing to put effort into promoting issues related to hurricane protection in even a general sense.

So that leaves...

Us?

The issue of hurricane and flood protection is fundamental to the most basic sustainability of this region in the short, medium, and long term. Does anyone have any suggestions as to how to inject our issue into the national conversation about the infrastructure stimulus bill?

In the mean time, I've floated the idea of flood protection for New Orleans to the Citizen's Briefing Book at Change.gov. The way it works is that if an idea is popular, Obama people respond to it. Failing that, it probably helps to put New Orleans issues out there to see how much they resonate with the mainstream liberals that presumably populate the Change.gov community.

There are only a few ideas on that site that directly relate to New Orleans. The one I've created appears to have the most points but that's not saying very much at all.

We need to force the issue. This little experiment takes all of 45 seconds of your time.

"Vote Up" Flood Protection for New Orleans

And tell your friends? Yeah, tell your friends.

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Easy Internet Activism Experiment

I've only casually browsed Change.gov, the grassroots arm of Barack Obama's transition. The Citizen's Briefing Book is pretty cool and at the very least, provides a forum through which even 'unconventional' ideas can be democratically evaluated and injected into the discourse. For instance, users have been enthusiastically promoting different suggestions related to the legalization or decriminalization of marijuana or other efforts to drastically reform drug policy. While it is unlikely that Obama administration will drastically liberalize drug policy, at least his surrogates were challenged to defend the status-quo in that regard. There was a minor media boomlet involving those issues, all because of the voting behavior of users of change.gov.

I wonder if New Orleanians can use this tool to circumvent our own feckless leadership.

Lately, I've become extremely troubled by our state leadership's priorities as Congress begins to negotiate an infrastructure stimulus package that could cost over $1 trillion. Early media reports are signaling that Governor Bobby Jindal and the Louisiana congressional delegation have aimed for a shockingly low share of that money, something in the order of $1 billion. I've been trying to dig into this and from what I can figure out, the majority of that request involves housing program deadline extensions and extra money to make up for the funding shortfall needed to begin construction on the controversial LSU/VA hospital redevelopment.

Why wouldn't our elected leaders aim a little bit higher than that? At the very least, a large request would highlight the forgotten needs of the region. How does Louisiana rank nationally on education, public health, incarceration rates, literacy, poverty, infant mortality, etc?

But forget all of that, even. What about our basic physical security?

What about Category 5 levees?

We need 'em. They ain't asking for 'em.

So let's try something.

Here, I've made a pitch to the new administration using the Citizen's Briefing Book. I don't get into the specifics of levee protection vs. seawalls vs. coastal restoration, but I try to briefly pitch the general issue of flood protection for New Orleans.

Right now, the leading issue is high speed rail with more than 5800 points.

One vote = 10 points.

Real Flood Protection for New Orleans under 100 points. So we have a ways to go.

But why not give this a whirl and see if things snowball?

Online political mischief, from the comfort of your desk!

Real Flood Protection for New Orleans NOW!!!!

And if you're browsing around and see another important New Orleans-related suggestion in the briefing book. Throw up a link in the comments section and I'll click-vote for it as well.

Levee Protection for Hurricane George

Maddow and Olberman were admirable in deconstructing President Bush's shameless revisions of his administration's handling of Katrina. The President was angry and defiant and showed not one shred of remorse.

I don't know what kind of accountability he and his administration will face once their reign of terror ends next week. I still believe that we could use a comprehensive federal Katrina Commission.

I would really like to see our next Mayor and City Council officially banish George W. Bush from Orleans Parish. I'm not suggesting that he'd have any interest in gracing us with his presence once he has retired, but it's important to build up our protections just in case Hurricane George threatens once more.

He was a hundred year President.

Or better yet, we could put a levy on the Bush family so that if he'd have to pay a fee in order to come visit. Something in the order of $15,000,000,000 seems fair.

Friday, September 19, 2008

Coast Guard on Southern Scrap: Rest "Assured"

I'm not too familiar with Sheila Grisset of the Times-Picayune, in fact I'm not sure I've ever noticed anything she's written until today. Her article on a meeting between the local Coast Guard commander and the SE Louisiana Flood Protection Authority-East was pretty atrocious. While still failing to provide any long view context as to who Southern Scrap is and the political history of it's recent ownership group, the article also fails to provide any real "news" from the Flood Authority's meeting with Coast Guard Captain Lincoln Stroh. Times-Picayune readers were subjected to a rote summary of what Mr. Stroh told "SELFPAE" (I guess?) and just a few choice quotes without any exploration as to whether or not the Coast Guard would be moving to hold Southern Scrap substantively accountable for their failure to secure their property floating in the Industrial Canal during Hurricane Gustav.

Instead we got lovely loose vessels such as these and are left to our own devices to provide the context:

"I am fully committed to you and the people of this area to help save and protect lives," Stroh told members of the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority-East.

You know Capt. Lincoln Stroh is on the defensive when he's caught publicly reminding people about his commitment to save lives.

And

"Nothing was going to float if Ike had continued on," he told them. Commissioners appealed to Stroh to take a hard line if any company violates his orders in the future.

Way to go SELFPAE (WCBF pronunciation: 'Self-pay'). Dear Coast Guard, next time Southern Scrap jeopardizes the very existence of the city of New Orleans, yell at them.

Wow. That's bad.

Anyway, the thing that jumped out to me beyond that lack of useful context in the article, because I suppose that there is a possibility that T-P editors gave Ms. Grisset a very restrictive length cap, was her repetitive phrasing.

Children, what did Captain Stroh do to the SELFPAE?

He "assured."

In fact, he, in Ms. Grisset's word, "assured" members of the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority-East three times within a very short article.

Eh, maybe I'm being hard on her. (Mirror check: my writing is horrendously wordy all of the time and just plain horrendous some of the time.)

I don't know about everybody else, but I don't want the Coast Guard's "assurance" that 'this won't happen again.' I want Southern Scrap to be punished. I want them out of the Industrial Canal entirely and I want the city and the Coast Guard to recoup monetary damages for actions necessitated by the vessels that Scrap officials failed to properly secure.

I don't think it would have compromised Ms Grisset's objectivity to press Captain Stroh and members of SELFPAE just a little bit about the possibility of actual penalties being levied against Southern Scrap.

But I never went to journalism school so what the hell do I know?

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Nagin On the Run From Past Levee Statement

Kudos to Jeffrey for noticing that Mayor C. Ray Nagin penned something today for the Times-Picayune. Jeffrey highlighted the precise passage I've been waiting all day to discuss:

Our levees withstood Gustav with Category 3 storm surges and Category 2 winds. Clearly, this is not sufficient. Our community deserves a flood protection system that allows us to feel secure in the face of storms, rather than dealing with frequent evacuations.

Given that the rest of this piece was a thinly-veiled response to his numerous detractors that don't agree that the evacuation and reentry was "tremendously successful," I saw this line as designed to clean up after a specific prior instance of verbal diarrhea on the part of Mayor Nagin. Recall what our Mayor said at a national press conference just one week ago on September 8th:

"Gustav proved . . . that our community and the levee-protection system probably can handle a Category 3 storm, " though he acknowledged that it had weakened to a Category 2 before making landfall.

"That fact in itself gives us great comfort that in another storm of similar strength we probably would be OK, " he said.

--

"We expect this test that we passed with the levees to increase the amount of construction activity in and around the city, " Nagin said.


Fascinating pivot.

Mayor Nagin seems to see his job as being one of creating the perception of recovery.

-The evacuation was "tremendously successful," instead of 'a small step in the right of direction.'
-Our levees "give us great comfort" during Gustav, instead of 'barely made it.'
-These "truths" will spur business activity in and around the city, instead of 'we have built next to nothing since Katrina and many of the developments we touted have stalled.'

Clearly the Mayor's line about the "comfort" provided by the levees ruffled feathers through a broad swath of New Orleans. Everyone, be they professional uptown landlords or amateur downtown renters, understands how fragile our levee system is. As the executive leader of the city of New Orleans, it is a critical part of the Mayor's job to make the case that the federal government should build us the levee system we deserve.

While I am happy to see that someone schooled Mayor Nagin as to how he can totally contradict himself in order to obscure an embarrassing misstatement, there's a big freakin' difference in impact between a single sentence on the back page of a mid-week local newspaper and a nationally-covered Gustav press conference.

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Support Jim Harlan in the LA 01

Jim Harlan is a self-financed Democrat running for US Congress against Steve "the Sleaze" Scalise in the LA 1st district, encompassing parts of Uptown, Lakeview, and Jefferson Parish. Here's an ad he's produced (h/t: Daily Kingfish)




Steve the Sleaze (aka 'the mistake by the lake') should also answer for his political dependency on anti-hurricane protection forces like Edward Diefenthal and Boysie Bollinger. If you look up either of those two New Orleans haters on the interwebs, you'll see they represent some of the Sleaze's biggest contributors, his base. You'll also notice that even though the Sleaze campaigned on the promise that coastal restoration and levee protection would be his top two priorities once in office, when a Congressional delegation was actually in New Orleans to specifically examine these issues, the Congressman felt it was more appropriate to be in Alaska of all places, fluffing big oil's drilling agenda in the Arctic wildlife reserve. (PGR caught this when it happened over a month ago)

In the middle of hurricane season, the Sleaze passed on an opportunity to advance a bipartisan coalition to federally fund levees and wetlands for Louisiana and instead stumped for the profits of big oil. What's even more inexplicable is that he was pushing for drilling expansion IN ALASKA instead of off the Louisiana coast. How is that representing your district, Steve?

What is wrong with this guy?

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Looting Out of Control

Oh my god! What about my stuff?!?

Every press conference with the Mayor and his Police Chief begins with an update on the number of looting arrests. There have been just a handful. It hasn't really been an issue.

But the looting update still leads the press conference and then leads the article, like this one from yesterday.

It's a dishonest picture of the situation here. The top story in New Orleans right now is the chaotic food stamp distribution process and the economic impact of the evacuation on the poor.

The Mayor and the Chief get to pat themselves on the back about tens of looters arrested for petty crime when they need to be challenged for their responsibility to the thousands needing the basics - food. The media should challenge Nagin's knowledge of the evacuation economy given his recent delusion regarding the high salaries of short-order cooks.

---

I should point out that the article which I sort-of criticize does do a great job challenging Nagin's almost comical assertion about what Gustav tells us about our levees.

This one is a C. Ray classic, only much more destructive to our recovery than usual:

"Gustav proved . . . that our community and the levee-protection system probably can handle a Category 3 storm, " though he acknowledged that it had weakened to a Category 2 before making landfall.

The reporters, Gordon Russell and Andrew Vanacore smartly go to Rising Tide key note speaker John Barry for a response:

"I don't think the mayor's comment is helpful, " said John Barry, author of "Rising Tide" and a member of the levee board that oversees the city's storm protection. "I wish he were right. He is, unfortunately, simply mistaken. We were lucky. The storm missed us. But it is good to know that in the areas where the storm did exert pressure, everything held up well."

Tuesday, September 09, 2008

Southern Scrap: More Than Meets The Eye [updated]

According to the Coast Guard, all 70 of the vessels that broke loose in the Industrial Canal during Hurricane Gustav belonged to a company called Southern Scrap.

'Loose Ships Sink Levees'


The loose vessels produced some of Gustav's scariest moments as they careened around the waterway, with some crashing into an interior floodwall, a bridge and industrial warehouses. At least one barge knocked holes in a nonfederal floodwall -- one not responsible for protecting New Orleans residents -- and there were fears that the next big storm could unleash barges in an unprotected industrial area and sweep them across open parking lots toward a federal floodwall that protects the Upper 9th Ward.

The rest of the Times-Picayune article outlines Coast Guard suspicions that Southern Scrap may not have followed it's own mooring plan :

Capt. Lincoln Stroh, the Coast Guard's New Orleans sector commander, wrote in his order to Southern Scrap that the "company has not shown the ability to follow (its) Heavy Weather Protection Plan as hurricanes approach this Port."

But the Times-Picayune avoids providing critical context. People should know about Southern Scrap and it's history.

First, let's remember that Southern Scrap has a history of failure when it comes to securing it's Industrial Canal assets as storms approach. That link leads to a T-P story from just a few weeks that details a court ruling allowing the Army Corps of Engineers to move forward with a lawsuit against Southern Scrap dating back to an unsecured drydock that sunk during Hurricane Katrina. Two other companies are moving forward with their own suits against Southern Scrap because their barges were damaged attempting to navigate the drydock wreckage. Additionally, the Port of New Orleans is suing Southern Scrap for the damage done to the Florida Avenue Bridge.

After their failures during Hurricane Katrina, Southern Scrap was somehow given the latitude to implement their own plan to secure vessels on the canal for Gustav without any oversight. The ongoing lawsuits related to Katrina represent critical context that T-P readers were denied.


--


But unfortunately that's not the only boat the T-P's been missing in its coverage of Southern Scrap.

As the paper does point out, Southern Scrap is a subsidiary of Southern Recycling which is a subsidiary of Southern Holdings. Or I should say it was a subsidiary of Southern Holdings.

Briefly, Southern Recycling (and largely, Southern Recycling and Southern Scrap can be discussed as one and the same), is one of the largest recyclers of scrap metal in the United States. It is a major force within that industry and gets a lot of fat contracts to help the government dispose of old ships.

Southern Recycling and the above umbrella Southern Holdings were founded by the extremely politically-connected Diefenthal family. Edward L. Diefenthal is one of the most active and loyal Republican donors in the South, having given hundreds of thousands of dollars to Republican candidates all over the country. The Diefenthals are also amongst the cabal behind David Vitter's Louisiana Committee for a Republican Majority (see this link also), a PAC that funnels untold amounts of money to Republican campaigns. Edward L. Diefenthal is amongst Governor Bobby Jindal's biggest financial boosters, which may be why we're not hearing much from the Governor's mouth about the barges.

It must be pointed out that Diefenthal and Southern Holdings sold Southern Recycling/Scrap in 2006 to a European company for just over $160 million and in no way am I insinuating that Diefenthal himself should have tied the barges. However, it may be helpful to ask whether or not his political influence had anything to do with the lack of oversight awarded to his companies, particularly since ownership only changed hands very recently and since Diefenthal still lists himself as CEO of Southern Scrap in campaign donations from this year.

It is also helpful to remember that Diefenthal only sold off Southern Scrap/Recycling after it became abundantly clear, especially to the politically connected, that it would be impossible to preserve the 'Hurricane Highway,' the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet, on which Southern Scrap relied to move big ships. That was after Diefenthal and other monopoly men dependent on MR-GO like shipping magnate Boysie Bollinger worked desperately to prevent or delay work on this critical security project on which the future of all of SE Louisiana depends. (Boysie Bollinger is another principal behind Vitter's LCRM and served on the BNOB commission, ensuring that MR-GO closure was not made a priority by that body's levees subcommittee)

Though the push to close MR-GO has been ongoing for decades, one wonders why even after the Katrina disaster so sinisterly exposed the risks of continuing to preserve the man made channel, it has still taken over three years to begin work. And at a relatively reasonable $25 million, it certainly wasn't the funding or the price tag that held things up. Of course that $25 million only pays for the plug and does not fill in the channel or restore the wetlands around it, but it's a critical first step that we should have taken years ago but did not because of the inordinate political influence of selfish millionaires like Bollinger and Diefenthal.

Now I think that's pretty critical context.




UPDATE: Loose Links and the Greater New Orleans Republicans

1. Mouthpiece background bio on Boysie Bollinger

2. Article detailing the parties for and against closure of MR-GO

Yet for several maritime companies along the Industrial Canal, including Bollinger Gulf Repairs, New Orleans Coal Storage and Lockheed Martin's Michoud plant, the MR-GO offers the sole outlet for ships too large for an alternative route through locks leading to the Mississippi River. If the MR-GO closes without an alternative route opening first, Bollinger Vice President Robert Socha said the repair dock's 300 jobs could go, too. "If one or the other isn't met, Bollinger Gulf Repair would probably cease to exist," he said.

And here's Congressman Jefferson really fighting for the people:

But St. Bernard Parish Councilman Craig Taffaro said his parish cannot wait that long.

"Congress needs to understand the people of St. Bernard lost everything, including loved ones, due to the negligence and lack of responsiveness by the federal government and Army Corps of Engineers in the maintenance of that structure," Taffaro said.

But the port has an ally in U.S. Rep. William Jefferson, D-New Orleans. In a statement issued last week, Jefferson signaled his support for keeping MR-GO open until the locks are completed.

"I will continue working with the Port of New Orleans and other interested parties so that New Orleans does not lose valuable business at the port," the statement said. "In the interim, I will also seek funding for the Inner Harbor Navigational Canal lock, which will allow us to close MRGO to commercial traffic."

Jefferson spokeswoman Nicole Venable said the congressman also wanted a floodgate system such as Melancon described. But she warned "not to cut off the (Gulf Outlet) altogether in the face of irrational fears."

Nice to see Congressman Jefferson tending to his constituents - the Bolinger and Diefenthal families. Just look at Edward Diefenthal's campaign contributions from 2004 alone! He gave to the horrific Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and rained $15,000 on the Greater New Orleans Republicans Fund. (Anyone remember them?)

3. Here's a strike against Boysie Bollinger from Oyster's archives.

4. Here's a link to some work by Mike Davis. It's a long, well-researched article.

Here's a quick hit:

Power and status in New Orleans have always been defined by membership in secretive Mardis Gras 'krewes' and social clubs, with the Krewe of Comus and the Boston and Louisiana clubs at the apex. 'Perhaps more than any other city in America,’ historian John Barry has written, 'New Orleans was run by a cabal of insiders...Looking on as if from behind a two-way mirror, these insiders watched and judged and decided.’

Then in the early 1990s, civil-rights activists led by feisty councilmember Dorothy Mae Taylor forced the token desegregation of the Mardis Gras and some of the clubs reluctantly admitted a few African-American millionaires. Despite a few old-guard holdouts (like Comus, which preferred to stop parading rather than integrate), Uptown seemed to be adjusting, however grudgingly, to the reality of Black political clout.

But, as post-Katrina events have brutally clarified, if the oligarchy is dead, then long live the oligarchy. While elected Black officials protest impotently from the sidelines, a largely white elite with overriding common interests - especially prime real estate and Tulane University - has wrested control over the debate about how to rebuild the city. This de facto ruling krewe includes Jim Amoss, the publisher of the Times-Picayune; Pres Kabacoff, developer-gentrifier and local patron of the 'New Urbanism'; Donald Bollinger, shipyard owner and prominent Bushite; James Reiss, real-estate investor and chair of the Regional Transit Authority (i.e. he was responsible for the buses that didn't evacuate people); Alden McDonald Jr., CEO of the largest African-American-owned bank; Janet Howard of the Bureau of Government Research (originally set-up by Uptown elites to oppose the populism of Huey Long); and Scott Cowen, the aggressively ambitious president of Tulane University.

But the dominating figure and literal kingpin is Joseph Canizaro, a wealthy property developer with friends in high places. First and most importantly, Canizaro is a leading Bush supporter with close personal ties to Karl Rove and the White House inner circle. Secondly, he is the power behind the throne of Mayor Ray Nagin, a nominal Democrat (he supported Bush in 2000) who was elected in 2002 with 80 percent of the white vote. And, thirdly, as the former president of the Urban Land Institute, he mobilizes the support of some of the nation's most powerful developers and prestigious master-planners.



5. Notice when the monopoly men were finally forced to cave to reality, they made sure that their puppet David Vitter would take all the credit.

Oh and don't you dare miss this one:

6. The New Yorker describes the "broad-chested and jowly" Boysie Bollinger as also possessing the "carriage of a viceroy." The following passage indicates the repulsive perspective from which this racist dirtbag sees the world:

Bollinger held the view that the Federal Emergency Management Agency was pampering evacuees, by handing families two thousand dollars in emergency help. “I said to the President, ‘You’re empowering people not to come back to work.’ The President said, ‘I don’t think two thousand dollars will do that.’ I said, ‘Mr. President, these people haven’t had two thousand dollars in their lives.’ ” Rather than wait, Bollinger was hiring as many Mexicans as he could find. “I’m hoping the people of New Orleans come back and take a different attitude toward employment,” he said, pulling open the door to a small office building. “But until they do . . .”

Boysie then shot an infant and kicked her screaming sister toddler into the river.

Last one I promise:

7. An Advocate article on Believe in Louisiana, a 527 created to promote Governor Jindal's conservative agenda exposes both Edward Diefenthal and Boysie Bollinger as top contributors, each giving at least $100k.

-

What these guys are doing and have done, the inordinate control they have on our political process - it ain't right.

They have a racket and if they don't break the law as it is, we've got to write laws that make it illegal to do what they do. When a social cabal of millionaires can drop $15,000 a pop into a hat that magically produces a mayor and a congressman with original favors to owe, you've got a problem on your hands.

Not too many towns in America that have it quite like New Orleans.

Monday, September 08, 2008

Senate Bill No. Whatever It Takes

Hopefully Senators Mary Landrieu and Barack Obama will be introducing Bill No. 0001 to the Senate floor as soon as that body is back in session. Essentially the bill articulates and provides funding for an immediate national service program that will provide a free college education or something like that to thousands of super awesome Americans to come down to the Gulf Coast and do three things: construct some impenetrable levees, restore some hurricane-blunting wetlands, and rebuild some affordable housing stock...

On the house side, even political opposites like Steve Scalise and Charlie Melancon agree that it's time to act.

Rep. Charlie Melancon, D-Napoleonville, agreed with Scalise and Landrieu that the flood threats posed by Gustav -- even though critical levees generally held firm -- will help persuade some in Congress to increase levee financing beyond what is already committed.

"The leadership of Congress -- especially Speaker Pelosi and Whip (James) Clyburn -- has shown tremendous compassion and commitment to our recovery from Hurricane Katrina and Rita, and I'm sure the support will only increase now that we've weathered Gustav," Melancon said.


Everybody wins!
Everybody can take credit!

You know, I have to agree with Oyster and Pistolette about Jindal's leadership. He was indeed competent and I appreciated his level of engagement with the details of the evacuation.

But what impressed me most was his constant reiteration of the national security risks posed by structurally unsound levees and depleted wetlands in SE Louisiana. He has called for immediate federal assistance and as a fast-rising leader within the GOP, he has some juice he can leverage to get this done.

We disagree about a lot of stuff related to our recovery process in Louisiana but everyone agrees that we can't survive without levees and wetlands. So everyone should get on board and do something about it - and I'm not just talking about emergency Gustav money. We need a long term solution, we have bipartisan consensus on levees and wetlands - so let's get it done.

Where do we start?

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Thanks For the Intro Award for the Day Goes to...

Athenae! (In the category of dudes with awesome proposals to rebuild national infrastructure, especially around New Orleans flood protection)

Friday, August 22, 2008

Evaluating the School Facilities Master Plan: 3rd Grade

Let's highlight a key passage from the RSD's press release that accompanied the master plan presentation from Monday. Unfortunately I cannot find an electronic copy of what was handed out in the press packets so you'll just have to believe my transcription.


The blueprint proposes a period between 2012 and 2016 when currently occupied buildings could be discontinued if the recommendations are implemented. Any buildings on landbanked property that are in excess of 51% damaged will be demolished. Any historic property or other important or valuable buildings will be repurposed, including the possibility that these properties may be sold to third parties and used for another purpose. Landbanked or repurposed schools could be made available to third parties to revive for a school, if permission is secured from the appropriate governing authority.


Now I think this was a very interesting thing to include.

Why would third parties want to revive a school in a town where, theoretically, our brand new '21st century schools' would be meeting our educational needs?

And why would third party operators be reviving landbanked schools and not the public school system itself?

At each presentation that Parsons-Concordia has given thus far, Mr. Bingler has been very careful to say that the master plan "was agnostic in terms of operator," meaning that determinations about the future of certain facilities did not take into account whether or not the building was operated by the RSD, the OPSB, or a charter.

Yet the RSD's own press release already is already floating this idea of a future of privatized education, but you have it specifically tied to the master plan's Phase II - which has no funding.

Who would those third party operators be and which communities would they serve?

---

A brief observation from Dr. Lance Hill of the Southern Institute for Education and Research:

Note the plan plans to demolish virtually all the open-admission public schools between St. Charles and the river: Banneker Elementary, Arthur Ashe Middle, McDonogh 7 Elementary, New Orleans Free School, and Bauduit Elementary.

The school facility demolition plan has nothing to do with flood protection. Note below that the plan is to demolish schools above sea level that have never flooded (uptown open-admission elementaries), while renovating selective admission schools like Franklin and Lusher that are below sea level and did flood. The criteria is clearly not elevation.


That's very interesting because "flood protection" is the refrain I constantly hear as a justification for withholding public dollars from certain neighborhoods in general terms.


UPDATE:

From loyal reader and blogger Alli (emphasis a combination of hers and mine):

"...Agnostic in terms of operator" and "third party operators" sounds like it's in reference to this article from the NYT over the weekend:

The theorist who has had the most influence over Pastorek is Paul T. Hill, who runs a research group at the University of Washington called the Center on Reinventing Public Education. In September 2005, while much of New Orleans was still submerged, Hill published an article in Education Week that urged state and federal officials and philanthropic foundations to resist the temptation simply to send emergency aid to whatever programs seemed most in need. "The circumstances call for a coherent strategy, not just a round of do-gooding," he wrote. "Don't spend money rebuilding the old district structure."

In 2000, in a book titled "It Takes a City," Hill and two other researchers laid out a new architecture for urban school reform that they called the Diverse Providers Strategy. Under this model, local school boards wouldn't run a school system hierarchically, the way they usually did; instead, they would oversee a "portfolio" of schools, some run directly by the board and many run on contract by nonprofits, universities or private companies. Schools would receive money on a per-student basis, and principals could then use that money to staff their schools as they liked and pay for whatever instructional methods they chose. Each school would negotiate salaries and work rules directly with its teachers. The system's small central office would be responsible only for oversight, though it would have considerable power to hold principals accountable: schools that didn't produce results would be closed, and successful schools would be imitated and replicated.

It is this model that Pastorek and Vallas have adapted for New Orleans. Pastorek says that he wants the state's role to be that of a "harvester of high-quality schools" in the city — nurturing promising ones and weeding out failing ones. "If schools run into trouble, you support them," Pastorek said. "But if they're still failing after you support them, then you pull the plug and bring in a new provider or an experienced provider. Over a period of 5 or 6 years, 10 at the most, we'll have nothing but high-quality operators in our city."


Diverse Providers: Because New Orleans Has Never Had Any Problems With Contracts, Ever.


Wait, when has New Orleans ever had trouble with private contracting? What is Alli talking about?

Monday, July 14, 2008


Thursday, June 05, 2008

Somone Ask Him

Does John McCain support all investigations into the federal levee failure and response during Hurricane Katrina?

Does John McCain retain full confidence in DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff?


Wednesday, June 04, 2008

McCain Confused About Katrina Votes

Today John McCain held a press conference in Baton Rouge in which he claimed to have voted for all investigations of Hurricane Katrina.




Yeah, no.

McCain indeed voted twice against empowering an independent commission to investigate the levee failures that caused the inundation of the city of New Orleans.

In the McCain campaign's email response to Talking Points Memo, a spokesman claimed that McCain had been "speaking to his strong support for the Homeland Security Committee's comprehensive, bipartisan investigation of Hurricane Katrina, which was already fully underway when these other proposals were suggested."

Oh, he was talking about the "bipartisan" investigation rammed down the throats of Democrats by the then-majority Republicans desperately trying to limit the political damage of the disaster.

They rejected Democratic appeals to model the panel after the Sept. 11 commission, which was made up of non-lawmakers and was equally balanced between Republicans and Democrats. That commission won wide praise for assessing how the 2001 terrorist attacks occurred, and for recommending changes in the government's anti-terrorism structure.

House and Senate GOP leaders announced the "Hurricane Katrina Joint Review Committee," which will include only members of Congress, with Republicans outnumbering Democrats by a yet-to-be-determined ratio. The commission, which will have subpoena powers, will investigate the actions of local, state and federal governments before and after the storm that devastated New Orleans and other portions of the Gulf Coast.


Ultimately, there were three Katrina investigations, one each by the House of Representatives, the Senate, and the Presidency. That which was produced by the House was boycotted by Democrats. That which was produced was the President was intended to be toilet paper. The Senate investigation was what the Democrats were left with after the independent commission was rejected in a vote down party lines.

This Senate investigation was launched on September 15th, 2005.

Thus, it was not "fully underway" when John McCain voted against the independent investigation on September 14th, 2005.

Levees.org is still demanding a real investigation of federal levee failures today.

Has McCain now flip-flopped to support an independent commission? Or is he just confused about where his "maverick" image ends and his vote to protect the Bush administration from being held accountable for the Katrina response begins?

Somebody should ask him.

Does Stephanie Grace of the Times-Picayune still think Katrina is "risk-free" for John McCain?

She seems just as confused.

Sunday, May 25, 2008

Our Nation in a Nutshell

A nutshell provided by our own government fully loaded with dangerously high levels of formaldehyde.

Today's long story in the Washington Post has been a long time coming. It's rage-inducing.

This is a picture provided with the article:


A photograph of a beautiful child. Now, a victim of the "accident" at the intersection of incompetence and not-giving-a-fuck.

Today, industry and government experts depict the rushed procurement and construction as key failures that may have triggered a public health catastrophe among the more than 300,000 people, many of them children, who lived in FEMA homes.


What kind of country is this?

1. The federal government built a faulty levee system that was undermined during Hurricane Katrina, nearly destroying the city of New Orleans.

So to make it up to us, they build us a new levee system more blatantly suspect than the one that preceded it. They build us leaking levees stuffed with newspaper.

2. The federal governments deficient emergency response procedures were a national embarrassment played out on international television. Thousands of people died and hundreds of thousands lost their homes.

So to make it up to the Gulf Coast, the federal government provided trailers contaminated by dangerously high levels of formaldehyde. When people started getting sick, FEMA refused to test. When Sierra Club tested and sounded the alarms, FEMA refused to test.

3. FEMA admitted formaldehyde was poisoning people in the trailers that they provided.

So to make it up to the citizens of the Gulf Coast, they reduced the sale price of the trailers so that citizens could own their own contaminated trailer. They do not have procedures in place to determine whether trailers being sold are still contaminated.


And some people criticize the Obamas and other Democrats for their American pride.

Those people ought to come down here. I'd like to ask them what they're so proud of exactly.

I see an awful lot to be ashamed of.

I thank the Bush administration from the bottom of my heart for all the help they've provided.

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Old Wounds Reopened, Covered in Salt

Then, doused with gasoline and lit on fire.

You know that if it's a post about FEMA, it's probably going to make you angry as hell.

Unfortunately...

Oyster and Judy B. refer to FEMA's new plan to sell trailers to residents at $13,000 a pop with the nothing but the most concrete assurances that the trailers they're planning to sell aren't the ones that have poisonous levels of formaldehyde:

Henderson is shocked the agency would do that after a FEMA test of her unit found elevated levels of formaldehyde gas, which she says has made her kids sick.

"One day I get a letter telling me my trailer is contaminated; the next day they want to sell it to me," Henderson said.

FEMA spokesman James McIntyre said the agency won't sell units that test high for formaldehyde. He could not say what FEMA has determined to be a safe level.

WOW! YOU HAVE GOT TO BE FUCKING KIDDING ME!!!!!!

I don't even know where to start.

Judy B. mentions that FEMA, in a panic, had already sold tons of its trailers to the public but was forced to buy them back in January after they FINALLY admitted what we had known for a year or more: that the trailers were making people sick.

Now FEMA is restarting the sale agenda though they won't say what constitutes a contaminated trailer and at least one family in Mississippi is being repeatedly asked to purchase a unit that has caused illness in the little ones.

Yet there's something else to remember here from only three months ago:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency misspent millions of dollars it received from selling used travel trailers, government investigators have found.

Instead of buying more trailers — as allowed under the law — FEMA used more than $13 million toward fully loaded sport-utility vehicles, travel expenses and purchase card accounts, according to a draft report by the Homeland Security Department's inspector general obtained by The Associated Press.

Did Brownie get his job back somehow too?

No, but R. David Paulson seems to be doing a heckuva job as well.

How is this crap being allowed? This is absolutely sickening.

---

In other news about the Federal government's push to murder the citizens of the Gulf Coast . . .

dsb reports that one of the levees that breached during Katrina but has since been repaired is leaking once again. Is that wall stuffed with newspaper as well? Is that the reason?

It's important to know right now because, well there's bad news here. Sorry.

There is a sales tax holiday for the purchase of evacuation supplies in Louisiana THIS SATURDAY AND SUNDAY.

HERE is a list of useful evacuation items you can purchase without the additional burden of the state sales tax.

Friday, April 25, 2008

Rebuild It, Stuff it With Newspaper - Whatever

Might as well just round us up and shoot us in the back of the head right now.

Get it over with.

Thank you Mr. Government for rebuilding our levees by stuffing them with newspaper.

Kudos to Lee Zurik for his report.

I wonder if anyone outside of the Newspaper River Delta gives a crap.

Blogger reactionz

Monday, December 03, 2007

Write a strongly worded letter

Apparently, there has been a complaint filed to the American Society of Civil Engineers alleging that ASCE leadership, the Army Corps of Engineers, and the Department of Defense worked intentionally to limit the scope of the official review and sabotage the work of independent bodies.

Click here to write a strongly worded letter to the ASCE asking them to make their investigation into these ethics complaints public.

(H/T: Levees.org)

Thursday, November 15, 2007

Levees.org, E Feeling Slighted

As many of you already know, the investigating firm blasted by a high school produced video for Levees.org has been pulled from youtube.

Jeffrey'll tell you about it at Liberry Chronicles
.

Yet, it doesn't say anywhere that I'm the one that posted the video on my site first!

I'm going to go ahead and take credit for the fact that the video spread faster than avian bird flu.

........

Let me stroke my ego please, everyone is encouraged to agree with me 100% and express outrage toward those that have slighted We Could Be Famous and Levees.org in the comments section.

Also why don't we watch another video by Levees.org: