Interesting Media Response

The New York Times story about Bill Clinton's shady private jet and presidential palace business dealings with uranium magnates and the authoritarian dictator of Pakistan has not received a whole lot of attention.

I find this curious because I found the story to be pretty devastating, though not completely unsurprising.

There is no mention of the revelations anywhere on CNN.com.

There is no mention of the revelations anywhere on MSNBC.com.

Don't see it anywhere on washingtonpost.com, either.

What's up with that?

Really, what's up with that?

It was on the front page of the New York Times website.

Americans wouldn't find this story compelling? It's not profitable enough? What? What is it?