Israel is threatening to deepen and widen it's campaign into the Gaza strip, mobilizing ground troops for a possible occupation. According to the New York Times, this bombing campaign is Israel's most massive in decades.
What precipitated such a massive retaliation?
Rocket attacks from Gaza into nearby Israeli towns apparently prompted the conservative administration of Ehud Olmert to respond, though those attacks yielded ZERO civilian casualties and few injuries.
Israel's military response has caused the deaths of hundreds of Palestinians and prompted Egypt to open its border to help evacuate the wounded.
Here is how the NYT rounds up the international response:
A number of governments and international officials, including leaders of Russia, Egypt, the European Union and the United Nations, condemned Israel’s use of force and also called on Hamas to end the rocket fire. But in strong terms, the Bush administration blamed Hamas for the violence and demanded that it stop firing rockets.
Early Sunday morning in New York, the United Nations Security Council issued a statement expressing concern about the escalation of the conflict and calling on both parties for an immediate end to all violence. The statement came after envoys of the 15-member council met for over four hours in a closed session, Reuters reported.
Just to reiterate, the EU and the UN have condemned Israel's action. Only George Bush stands in solidarity with Mr. Olmert, who resigned this past summer after a disastrous conflict with Lebanon in 2006 and rampant accusation of graft and corruption. (sort of familiar, no?)
Prime Minister Olmert, in another striking similarity to his ally President Bush, will be leaving office shortly. Israeli elections are scheduled for February 10th. It was only one month ago that his own foreign minister called on him to step down immediately.
When Bush leaves Washington DC three weeks from now, Olmert will be deprived of his most loyal friend. While I have no doubt that Barack Obama will maintain partnership with Israel, I do not expect that the Obama administration will signal the same blind approval for such wantonly violent retaliations as President Bush has.
Given that Israel is responding to attacks that caused ZERO casualties, it seems way too reasonable to conclude that Prime Minister Olmert is waging war out of selfish political consideration, manufacturing a conflict crisis that might sandbag foreign minister Livni's chances against hardliner Netanyahu in February's election.
When mainstream American Jews like me immediately leap to conclusions like that, doesn't Israel have a public relations disaster on its hands?
Israeli war hawks have cultivated an alliance with neoconservative Christianists in the United States. That approach has contributed to the inhumane policy that has increasingly placed at risk the sympathies of the 75% of American Jews that have voted liberal in every single election dating back to the 1920s.
That's sad.
